Here is the Adirondack Park Agency's website discussing their proposal for the reclassification. Included are very good maps of the area indicating the scope of the proposed changes.
http://www.apa.state.ny.us/State_Land/index.html
I have included my complete remarks below:
My name is Joe Mahay. Thank you for the opportunity to express my opinion here tonight. As a resident of the Adirondack Park since 1971 who has worked, owned land, and operated several small businesses here, I wish to express my support for the reclassification of the state lands and the new state land classifications proposed by the Department and the Adirondack Park Agency.
This area is one of the greatest recreational resources in the United States, as described in the April 2009 edition of the National Geographic Adventure Magazine. It ranks the flat water canoeing in this portion of the Adirondacks as #5 in its list of the 50 best American Adventures.
I suppose it should be unnecessary to point out that by far the vast majority of the flat waters in the Adirondacks are open to use by motor boats and anyone who wants to jet ski or cruise, fish, or water ski with a motor boat can do so - often with access provided by a New York State boat launch site. And anyone who wants to canoe or kayak in these conditions is also free to do so - and many do.
What is in scarce supply are flat waters where one can canoe or kayak in quiet remote wilderness conditions without the whir and whine and wake of engine driven craft. That is the prize, the unique recreational opportunity that these classifications will help to preserve. That is what results in national recognition of the area as a recreational resource for America.
I suppose it should be unnecessary, also, to point out as one irony of life that when we use a motor to access wilderness, we soon no longer have a wilderness. In the Adirondack Park there are literally hundreds of miles of paved and gravel roads through wild forest and along the edges of wilderness and hundreds of miles of shorelines classified as wilderness or wild forest with motorized access on the lakes and ponds making up those shorelines - motorized access is not a problem nor a scarce commodity. Yet one of the ironies of all of this motorized access is that, once we have the access, the remoteness and quiet of a wilderness experience is gone as most everyone attests. It is self defeating to try and provide motorized access to remoteness. Unless a line is drawn somewhere, the somewhere we desire no longer exists.
For these reasons, I strongly support the proposed reclassifications from primitive area to wilderness and the new classifications as wilderness and the classification of the state owned lands under the water bodies as wilderness as a guarantor of this unique recreational resource for future generations.
1 comment:
I agree 100% and for the very same reasons.
It bothers me that we even have to give the just-say-no-to-wilderness people in the Adirondacks a voice. I mean, FOR CHRIST SAKE, you live in the ADIRONDACKS - live with it on the terms it comes with.
If you're looking for development and a vibrant economy, then don't let the blue line hit you in the ass on the way out.
You wanna ride your snowmobile (where you can) and blow away our wildlife - live outside the Adirondacks, with all the jobs, WalMarts, and mini malls you could possibly want - and do what other recreationists do - go there as often as you can.
But don't demand development in a place that is so rare it's practically a miracle - a relatively intact ecosystem in the northeast in the twenty-first century.
It's paradise to millions of people that have little choice but to live outside the park for economical reasons - stop asking to mess it up and spoil it, holding it back each and every time there is a chance to make it better and better.
Post a Comment